Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 12,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2007, 12:50 am
Baloney, in my opinion. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
A priest, a rabbi, and a Supreme Court Justice walk into a bar. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
And given how long they’ve been pending, we’re due for more opinions soon. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 8:55 pm
With our wealth of experience and deep dedication to justice, we’re more than equipped to assist with your sexual assault claim. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Here’s an excerpt from Justice Breyer’s opinion for the Court: It would seem obvious that the words in these provisions are, as ordinarily used, sufficiently broad to include within their scope the dissemination of false or misleading information with the intent to defraud. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
We generally aren’t reckless drivers; we’re just incompetent. [read post]
5 May 2007, 12:53 pm
"'Standing up to what is generally supreme in a democracy: the popular will,'" is what judges do, according to Justice Ginsburg, who was quoting Justice Scalia.Ninth Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote, in one of the many opinions he's gift-wrapped for the religious right (have leftists investigated the possibility that he's a mole?) [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
No other Justice has been confirmed by a single vote. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Shortly after the Dobbs draft opinion was leaked, Planned Parenthood urged Westchester County (an affluent suburb of New York) to enact an eight-foot buffer zone. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:36 am
Natural Res. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
Appeal Court The Appeal Court allowed the appeal and re-set the price of the dissenting shareholders’ shares to US$49.98 per share. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 7:54 pm
With our wealth of experience and deep dedication to justice, we’re more than equipped to assist with your sexual assault claim. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
To be sure, there are extraordinarily important questions raised as to the allocation of authority over children’s education, an issue much under-played at the time, save in Justice Douglas’s opinion, but presented front and center, say, by lawsuits challenging the ability of Chasidic parents to deprive their children basically of any non-religious education, including assuring facility in use of the English language. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
(In re Sheena K. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 12:11 am
More likely, OLC and/or the Vice President had simply concluded that the funding restrction in 8131(b) was substantively unconstitutional, because it impinged on the Preisdent's Commander-in-Chief authorities (the Torture Opinion/NSA White Paper theory). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
After review, five Justices agreed with Sheehan, but Chief Justice John D. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:19 pm
The President, however, controls the Justice Department, and his appointees can decline to take action against those ignoring House subpoenas. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
This means that the case is re-opened, and will have to be tried or disposed of in some other fashion. -- > Final dispositions of debt suits. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:14 am
Justice Crawford joins the dissent. [read post]
