Search for: "In Re United States"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 43,313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2024, 10:53 am
As we move to finalize the Humane Scorecard, we’re reaching out to congressional offices to let them know that there’s still time for legislators to cosponsor the bills we’re scoring. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 1:56 pm
Whether it's the state or the county that pays for it, who knows? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
It was an interesting discussion of the legal questions surrounding the plan as well as a broader discussion of the state of environmental regulation in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm
Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward's The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford University Press) is reviewed here. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:08 pm
Public health concerns, and the rapidly evolving situation in the United States now makes any other decision reckless. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
In order to appreciate the insignificance of the United States Sentencing Commission’s recommendation that guideline drug sentences be reduced by 17%, one needs to remember the pre-Mistretta days of America. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
FRCP 1, for example, says: “These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts…They should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
FRCP 1, for example, says: “These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts…They should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:37 am
[We're happy to have Ed Walters, CEO of Fastcase, as our guest blogger] Greg Lambert issued a dire proclamation here the other day: If Law.Gov remains an exercise in Academia . . . [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 7:32 am
That’s the lesson that should have been learned by this anonymous individual who attempting to take the nearly $200,000 from the United States to Mexico, for unknown reasons (but really, we all know it’s drug related, right?) [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 7:32 am
That’s the lesson that should have been learned by this anonymous individual who attempting to take the nearly $200,000 from the United States to Mexico, for unknown reasons (but really, we all know it’s drug related, right?) [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:47 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
Corporations are able to re-litigate cases they have already lost in domestic courts. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:35 pm
This law was made possible in cooperation with the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:41 pm
There's an appeal there, too, we're told.An even worse pick.Finally, today the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in the fourth bisphosphonate case, Stevens. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:01 pm
There may not be unanimity on how to change the current state of pet food manufacturing, testing and inspection in the United States, but there seems to be general agreement that some changes need to be made, if only to reduce the number of recent pet food recalls and associated illnesses that have killed or sickened thousands of our companion animals. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm
This episode underscores the urgency for passage of the Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act, S. 877, which would end all commercial trade in the United States of shark fins and products containing shark fins. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
The United States ratified the convention 20 years ago. [read post]
