Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
Hohenberg et al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
” (citing Lemel v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
Back in 2010, in the case of Jordan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:25 am
*It shall be an affirmative defense to any charge under this Paragraph pursuant to this Section that the label on the container of the prescription drug or the manufacturer’s package of the drug does not contain a warning against combining the medication with alcohol. (5) The operator is under the influence of one or more drugs which are not controlled dangerous substances and which are legally obtainable with or without a prescription and the influence is caused by the operator… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:32 pm
Western Sugar Cooperative v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm
Based upon my own research and the below discussion, I must conclude that, more likely than not, the jurors in the case of Hunter v Phillip Morris resulted in a less than full disclosure of the evidence relating to the outrageous conduct of the tobacco industry. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm
Based upon my own research and the below discussion, I must conclude that, more likely than not, the jurors in the case of Hunter v Phillip Morris resulted in a less than full disclosure of the evidence relating to the outrageous conduct of the tobacco industry. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
The case Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
In Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:18 pm
For starters, Hill alleges that contrary to the statutory requirement at FDC Act § 505(j)(2)(A)(v) that the labeling for a generic drug be “the same” as the labeling approved for the brand-name, reference listed drug relied on for approval, “the generic forms of fluocinolone acetonide that FDA has approved will almost certainly include labeling that is substantially different from the labeling used on Hill’s products. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
NAACP v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
BSN Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:13 pm
In Oakland Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
Florida; NFIB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm
Anita Ortiz Maddali (Northern Illinois University College of Law) has posted Padilla v. [read post]
