Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 8,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Example: NTP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg and I crossed Kathryn Kase, past-Executive Director of Texas Defender Services, now back to the trenches fighting Texas’ love of execution. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:06 pm
This may explain, for example, why Justice Robert decided– in his Hague v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:28 am
In Marlow v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:11 am
Consent and other legal grounds for processing The Standard lays down a basic rule that the collection of personal information and its subsequent use should be affirmatively consented to ahead of time, with further (informed) consents being required for any activity exceeding the scope of the original consent. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:04 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:55 pm
A recent case from the California Court of Appeals, Lloyd v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
Eugene V. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Let us start with Madison in Federalist 51: In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent, is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted, that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others. . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
He ruled that the entire trial could be broadcast by audio, and that the media could televise the opening and closing arguments, any interlocutory applications, the judgment, and the evidence of the experts and police witnesses for the state, as well as any lay witness who consented to being televised. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:28 am
Refusal to Perform An Illegal Act A Texas Supreme Court case called Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
This is a funny sort of book review. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:04 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Epic v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:08 pm
In the main case in the area, Hungary v Slovakia, an agreement to build a dam agreed between the two countries made during the terms of Cold War era governments was held to still bind their democratic, successor governments. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:33 am
V. [read post]
