Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 21,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
In the Totten's case, they were able to recover, even though it was a single vehicle accident. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Filing a lawsuit against all the possible defendants who may be liable is customary after an auto accident, as before litigation Ms. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:10 am
The defendant could be forced to take the necessary precautions and has to bear the legal costs for the lawyer's letter by the copyright owner (Abmahnkosten). [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 10:57 am
These may not be the only defendants – and they may not be liable at all. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:05 am
In other cases – such as accidents involving more than two cars – there may be more than one defendant because more than one person’s actions caused the injury. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Whether a defect is too trivial to make the defendant liable for the injury is generally a question for the jury to decide. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 9:12 pm
Thus, CAFC said the evidence supported the trial court's finding that the defendant did not intend to induce infringement, which was the mens rea required for liability under 35 USC 271(b). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:42 pm
That's a hollow victory. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
According to news reports, after a two-month, hard-fought trial, the jury found that DePuy Orthopaedics and parent company Johnson & Johnson were liable to plaintiffs for the Pinnacle’s design and manufacturing defects. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:57 am
The defendant found not liable yesterday was Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
However, this is not fatal to a negligence claim as, even in the absence of privity, New York law allows the assertion of a cause of action for negligence resulting in property damage (see 905 5th Assocs., Inc. v Weintraub, 85 AD3d 667, 668 [1st Dept 2011] [finding that “the lack of privity does not affect plaintiffs’ ability to bring a general negligence claim against the [defendant] architect for property damage sustained by them” where there are “issues of fact as… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:44 am
We are passionate about defending the rights of innocent victims of alcohol-related crashes, and would be happy to discuss your case with you in a free consultation. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm
Today’s case, EA v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:47 am
Alternatively, you can accept an out-of-court settlement if the defendant is willing to pay a reasonable amount for compensation. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
It also has to consider whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:55 am
The trial court found American States potentially liable, with a duty to defend and indemnify in court. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:53 am
Please do not hesitate to contact us today, as there is a time limitation on how long after the wrongful death that a lawsuit may be filed against those liable. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
After suit was initiated, the Defendant store filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss on various grounds.The Plaintiff's claims against Wal-Mart for assault and battery were dismissed given the lack of any facts to support any allegations that the store intentionally harmed the Plaintiff. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Both families have a civil claim against the driver, and any other potential and non-obvious defendants. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:21 am
This enormously reduces the evidentiary burden on plaintiffs, who only need to prove that the defendant was engaged in the activity, and that the activity caused the harm complained of.In Fiorentino the plaintiffs asserted, among others, a claim for strict liability. [read post]
