Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 21,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Yaron Shaham The post Defendants were not Significant Defendants under CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception to Warrant Remand appeared first on CAFA Law Blog. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:32 pm
According to the plaintiffs, the State was liable for negligently supervising and retaining the employee who committed the assault. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:49 am
Defendants appealed, arguing plaintiff’s marijuana use was wrongly excluded as evidence. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:46 am
Implementing these practices can assist employers in defending against off-the-clock overtime lawsuits. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:51 am
The defendants admitted that they were liable but requested a trial on the issue of damages. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:33 am
Property owners can also be held liable if they had constructive notice, or should have known that a hazard existed. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
This seems simple enough, but what happens if a person is drunk driving, which is breaching one’s duty of due care, but it is not that breach that causes damages. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 6:10 am
A police officer’s failure to take the necessary precautions when operating a patrol car may result in the officer, the department, or the city being liable for a victim’s injuries through a South Florida personal injury lawsuit. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 1:49 pm
Defendants filed a counter-complaint, and the trial court ultimately dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims and found that plaintiffs were liable to defendants for nuisance, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:22 am
The defendants argued that the emergency doctrine applied, and that doctrine made them not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
The defendant argued that the plaintiff assumed the risks involved with horseback riding and that he should not be held liable as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:01 am
Jurors decided it was more likely than not Simpson defendant was responsible for plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 4:33 pm
It explained an owner’s duty is determined by a visitor’s status on the property. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
” On the merits, Facebook qualifies for Section 230 protection: 1) Facebook provides an ICS, citing Klayman, Caraccioli, Sikhs for Justice. 2) Facebook qualifies as a publisher/speaker because “all of La’Tiejira’s claims seek to hold the Facebook Defendants liable for decisions about the monitoring, screening, and deletion of user-generated content. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 6:44 am
However, the prospective defendants of the case say they did not allow their son to take the boat out that day, and should not be liable for the other boy’s death. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pm
If a defendant is found to be liable under the federal False Claims Act, it will have to pay for the government’s losses, plus penalties for each false claim. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Accordingly, the court found that Freightplus and IMC stood in the special NVOCC/VOCC relationship and IMC was therefore liable to indemnify Freightplus for damages arising out of its negligence.[2] Liable carrier’s responsibility for attorney’s fees In light of the allocation of 30% fault to IMC and IMC’s duty to reimburse Freightplus for that share of damages, Freightplus claimed that IMC further owed it 30% of its… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Accordingly, the court found that Freightplus and IMC stood in the special NVOCC/VOCC relationship and IMC was therefore liable to indemnify Freightplus for damages arising out of its negligence.[2] Liable carrier’s responsibility for attorney’s fees In light of the allocation of 30% fault to IMC and IMC’s duty to reimburse Freightplus for that share of damages, Freightplus claimed that IMC further owed it 30% of its… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Accordingly, the court found that Freightplus and IMC stood in the special NVOCC/VOCC relationship and IMC was therefore liable to indemnify Freightplus for damages arising out of its negligence.[2] Liable carrier’s responsibility for attorney’s fees In light of the allocation of 30% fault to IMC and IMC’s duty to reimburse Freightplus for that share of damages, Freightplus claimed that IMC further owed it 30% of its… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:35 am
In plaintiff’s lawsuit, it was alleged defendant homeowners made modifications to the pool that turned the color of the water dark, thus making it difficult to see under the surface. [read post]
