Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8141 - 8160
of 21,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
The court also declined to entertain related control person liability claims, never reached other CEA merits claims, and dismissed a state law unjust enrichment claim (Choi v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:25 am
The case, Maynard v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
The student might also those distinctive features that gives law a special quality, marking law as different in character from other forms of command, guidelines, or direction. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
The Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
In Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am
Knoetze v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:32 am
Sanguineti v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” (quoting Hilton v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
However, the Supreme Court held in 2003, in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
Readers with a fancy for online IP enforcement will remember that last July the Court of Appeal of England and Wales issued its decision in Cartier and Others v BSkyB and Others [here], in which it upheld the 2014 decision of Arnold J in the High Court [here and here] that blocking injunctions are also available in trade mark cases under the general power recognised by s37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA). [read post]