Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
Abdouch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
In the case of Chesik v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm
Immigration Law Case: United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
With this order, the President single-handedly targeted one of the most sought-after visa programs in the United States—the H-1B visa program for highly-skilled temporary foreign workers. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
They never adopted the children in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
California v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
United States (1 [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:34 pm
The death penalty was suspended in the United States from 1972 through 1976 primarily as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In American Meat v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:49 am
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
It was likewise bad news for the state-on-top habeas petition in Hoffner v. [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] What happens when the Justice Department files a brief against a federal agency?
18 Mar 2017, 8:26 am
The President of the United States now has the power to supervise and direct the Director of the CFPB, and may remove the Director at will at any time. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
It also cited the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 1:07 pm
., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:25 am
Titomirov would be in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am
<> United Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (2010) (“[The petitioner] argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence and the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
