Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 8141 - 8160
of 9,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times discusses the Court’s just-concluded Term and the tension between the Court and President Obama following the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
Kozinksi was channeling Justice Brandeis’s words dissenting in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am
In his dissenting judgment, Justice Breyer accepted that the Government did “identify a compelling countervailing interest, namely, the interest in protecting the securityof the United States and its nationals from the threats that foreign terrorist organizations pose by denying those organizations financial and other fungible resources”. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Although the precise circumstances of the instant applications appeared not to have previously arisen, in analogous circumstances where a conviction was based on the law as it was understood to be, a subsequent change in the law would not be a valid ground for leave to appeal out of time unless substantial injustice had been done: R v Benjafield (Karl Robert) (Confiscation Order) (2002) UKHL 2, (2003) 1 AC 1099. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm
Frank United States District Court District of Minnesota 316 North Robert Street St. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Bork to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In that decision (which we discussed in an earlier blog post), federal district court judge Robert Gettleman declined to follow Sunbelt, noting that “[t]he Illinois Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and this court, however, have not rejected the applications of the legitimate business interest test. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:37 am
Here is one excerpt of his analysis: In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:30 pm
So a lot of people are denying their opportunity to come before the court.Circuit City v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
United States, 556 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
