Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 8141 - 8160 of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 7:14 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has roundly rejected the plaintiff’s arguments in that case, firmly upholding the Department’s actions. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:42 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 12-60291.Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:01 pm
" A useful corrective to WTO specialists who like to think of their organization as all but all-powerful. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am by INFORRM
Letting in the light, is the best way of keeping those exercising the judicial power of the state, up to the mark and for maintaining public confidence. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
A state government possesses power over our health, education and welfare – the so-called police powers. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Rosalind English
This morning we reported on the case of Sinclair Collis Ltd v Secretary of State for Health & Anor [2010] EWHC 3112 (Admin) – see Isabel McArdle’s post on the case. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 am
The ruling was hailed as the disability civil rights equivalent to Brown v. [read post]