Search for: "STATE v. BROWN"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 8,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
But the New Deal/Civil Rights Era that produced Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Vermont National Telephone Company v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson drew questioning back to the fundamental role of the court’s authority on equal protection, invoking Loving v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
… After the United States Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
By Michael Kiely & Phillip Tate In his budget submitted on January 10, 2011, one week after taking office, Governor Jerry Brown proposes to slash $12 billion in State spending in a wide array of areas, including, welfare, health services and higher education. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
” Cunniff states the report’s bottom line as follows: “After an objective analysis, the reviewer concluded that the Sagadahoc County Sheriff’s Office’s responses to concerns about Mr. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Bray v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Lawcast 203: Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
First, the government confirms in detail, at pages 3-6 of its reply brief, what I surmised last week: Both of the conditions would undermine the government's furtherance of its compelling interests, principally because there would be state-law obstacles to the creation of contraception-only insurance policies, and because the "opt in" requirement would impose burdens on women that their male counterparts do not share and that would, as a practical matter, decrease the… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
And it’s named after an inspiring figure: Raymond V. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Secretary Carson stated that the regulation was “unworkable and ultimately a waste of time for localities. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
