Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
As IntLawGrrl Hope Lewis has written, Hurston became an "anthropologist of Black cultures in the southern United States, Haiti, and Jamaica. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:53 pm
Bullcoming which has made its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:07 am
Carvalho v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Omar [2010] EWCA Civ 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 344 “A short term of imprisonment on the part of an EEA worker during his first five years in the United Kingdom meant that the time needed to establish a right permanently to reside had to begin anew after his imprisonment had concluded. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:12 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
United States purposes), but I think that Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion is consistent with Justice Alito’s concurrence on this point, and the concurrence certainly should be seen as important to understanding that majority opinion.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm
These changes consisted of adding a definition of the term "state" that includes the District of Columbia and United States commonwealths and territories (Fed. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 4:12 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Another First Amendment issues affecting school students across the United States concerns bracelets stating “I ? [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 281 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir.2001)). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:31 am
For example, the United States does not have a treaty with any other country for enforcing judgments. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
In short, the Court’s decision in Snyder v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
(You may recall that the United States outlawed the importation of enslaved people in 1808, but in the early 1820s other countries had not yet moved to prohibit the international slave trade.) [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 8:14 am
Yet in the same courthouse a few months earlier, a different federal judge, in the case of United States v. [read post]
