Search for: "State v House" Results 8141 - 8160 of 28,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 12:25 pm by John Floyd
  Conviction of Sex Abuse of Child Leads to Loss of Community Property   This past June the Texas Supreme Court in Bradshaw v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 10:02 am by Samuel Cohen
The judgment of the High Court in National Crime Agency v Mrs A [2018] EWHC 2534 3 is the first public example of enforcers’ application for, and judicial examination of, a UWO. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The Civil Procedure Rules and the case of Chesters Accommodation Agency v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:35 pm by Benjamin H. Barton
And paying for them can crowd out even more urgent needs, such as policing, education, health care, and housing. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
But a White House position didn’t work out for this man willing to “take a knee” in utter submission to the president. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am by CMS
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 1:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The clause expressly states that these purposes are included. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]