Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8141 - 8160
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
Rose v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
It denied Lockheed’s motion; however, to the extent the company sought sanctions pursuant to the court’s inherent authority to assess fees against litigants who have acted in bad faith (Timmons v Lockheed Martin Corp, January 22, 2014, Arguello, C). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:05 am
Last night's Puerto Rico decision did not discuss City of Pontiac v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:38 am
Opening Remarks: Assemblymember Ed Chau, Chair, Select Committee on Privacy Assemblymember Ian C. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The legal status of constitutional preambles continues to generate substantial interest, especially in states whose constitutional orders are experiencing periods of vibrant development. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:33 am
R. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
A seismic shift in the state's civil litigation landscape was felt on June 28 when state Gov. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am
The Court of Appeal held that the concept of territorial jurisdiction for breach of contract is based on any or a combination of the following three factors – (a) where the contract was made (lex loci contractus); (b) where the contract is to be performed (lex loci loci solutions);.and (c) where the defendant resides. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
Here, the appeals court first found that the Supreme Court’s decision in McKennon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
Ina Shoe Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Wyly, Jr., Michael C. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen — who took the lead in blowing open the (separate) Richart Ruddie/Profile Defenders deindexing fraud story — has just gone to court to set aside the order in one such case, Welter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
In fact, in the June 7, 2012 decision of Fortunato v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:52 pm
Carlsbad came from the Federal Circuit, which had split from several others, including the Ninth, to hold that 28 USC § 1447(d) precludes appellate review of a remand order based on the district court’s discretionary decision under 28 USC § 1367(c) not to assert supplemental jurisdiction over state claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
In particular, NWC briefs have addressed compelling legal issues to prevent attempts to weaken the False Claims Act (FCA) before the United States Supreme Court in cases like State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
SpeechNow v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
SpeechNow v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm
In re Ethan C. [read post]
