Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 29,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am
(NA) Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:27 pm
" New York v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:38 am
Mayo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
(It begins with "Congress shall ... [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:23 am
Medtronic relied on Buckman Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Daugaard v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:28 am
First, the opinion, before reaching the merits, states that 4 votes (without Justice Sotomayor weighing in) remain in support of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:15 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
See Nader v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
The term “state,” as used in the ACA, has a broad meaning that encompasses “state” in the scholarly sense of a nation-state and the customized meaning of “state” as a sub-national unit of government. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:43 pm
As the 4th Circuit concluded in its forceful 1997 opinion in Zeran v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States previously stated that Congress, when enacting the statute quoted above, spoke with great clarity as to its intention. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
Congress has never given the SEC authority to create a federal fiduciary principal that would override state standards, and “Supreme Court jurisprudence cautions against the formulation of broad new duties absent some explicit evidence of Congressional intent. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:23 am
Elliot v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:23 am
Attorney malpractice is normally a state-law cause of action brought in state court. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
First, plaintiffs argue that the provision fails the ambiguity test under Pennhurst State Sch. v. [read post]
