Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
"10 Conclusion For the reasons stated herein, we hold that a sheriff's deputy is not the holder of a lucrative office for purposes of Article II, section 9. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
QIP Holders; in that post, I point to other precedent expressly using 230 to shut down discovery fishing expeditions. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
See Genentech, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 6:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:10 am
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year in Holder v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:57 am
” In FTC v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Calogero and Leclerc v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:15 am
See Bebchuk v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:37 pm
Three weeks ago, in No. 05-1345, United Haulers Association v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:10 pm
Supreme Court overruled the so-called Fobian rule in the Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 5:01 pm
Vincent v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:32 pm
In Pecore v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:51 pm
A newly created Standing Commission will make recommendations to Congress regarding the Y visa numerical cap for each fiscal year following the initial year of the program Title V Title V restructures and rebalances the current system by which green cards are distributed. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:53 am
" State v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:02 am
This fair use argument appears to be the "nominative fair use" argument the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the court whose law applies to this case, as it was filed in California federal court) found compelling in New Kids on the Block v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES
Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES
S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing
Same as A 6300
BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:50 pm
This provision further adds to such expenses the enumerated items set forth in Section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(II, III, IV and V), (iii) and (iv). [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:16 am
This was the issue before the Third Department yesterday in People v Cabrera, 2007 NY Slip Op 03798. [read post]
