Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 8141 - 8160 of 29,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Elizabeth Allan, Scott R. Anderson
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 12:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
CumminsFoley, Comerford & CumminsScranton, PA    Over the past year, the Pennsylvania state trial and appellate courts have continued to grapple with issues pertaining to social media discovery as well as the admissibility of social media evidence at trial.Discoverability of Social Media ContentIn Kelter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 11:41 am by Daniel Hemel
Second, West Virginia will have to decide whether to respond to the Supreme Court’s opinion by “leveling up” or “leveling down. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am by Scott Bomboy
Timbs’ appeal to the United States Supreme Court was only about the incorporation of the Excessive Fines Clause at the state level, and not its application to civil forfeiture cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]