Search for: "State v. Register" Results 8141 - 8160 of 13,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
The report stated that:“[IA] 33 years old patient who has been registered in my practice since July 2010. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
The report stated that:“[IA] 33 years old patient who has been registered in my practice since July 2010. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the… [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am by Miriam Seifter
 All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:25 pm by Matthew David Brozik
I can’t write a better introductory sentence than Judge Andrew Carter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York did to open his May 20, 2013, order and opinion in Blagman v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Gene Quinn
Addressing the RCE Problem Last week, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced in the Federal Register that it would modify the After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP) to create an After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 (AFCP 2.0). [read post]
20 May 2013, 3:18 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
FREE ADMISSION - if you would like to attend please register via: http://www.eventbrite.com/org/3243671868? [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Deputy Scheller searched the vehicle and found a revolver that was registered to respondent. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
One would hope that, on the 20th anniversary of the NVRA, the Supreme Court will recognize that states must not be permitted to evade federal law by re-defining the qualifications necessary to register to vote. [read post]