Search for: "State v. Save" Results 8141 - 8160 of 11,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm
  Remand.But that doesn't stop the United States from trying again. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:22 am
Yesterday, the Third Circuit weighed in on an employee's 14th Amendment right to privacy in Doe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
Douglas came to the Court as a result of California’s efforts to save money by reducing the rates that it would pay to doctors and hospitals participating in Medicaid, a joint federal-state program that provides health care to the poor and disabled. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by S2KM Limited
A prior S2KM blog post examines these three defense strategies in the context of the Spencer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by admin
In 1947, the Supreme Court, in Lillie v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:15 am by Steven M. Gursten
Dairyland Insurance contested wage loss benefits – while at the same time  proving the auto accident victim was entitled… In Grays v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]