Search for: "State v. Self" Results 8141 - 8160 of 15,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2007, 10:30 pm
 Beware having the accused testify in Virginia state court. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am by Jimmy Chalk, Sarah Grant
They permit Japanese forces to, under limited circumstances, carry arms overseas and contribute to collective self-defense activities in support of allies. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Hodges," because the lower court held that anti-LGBTQ+ bias is not protected by religious freedom.All of which means that at least some of the tactics and self-reinforcing outrage that brought the US right to its current degraded state now seems to be bubbling up in Canada as well. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Andres
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has dealt a blow to existing intermediary liability rules in Europe in the case of Delfi v Estonia. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Sixth Circuit’s decision is the latest to embrace the pleading standards of Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  -- Justice Hugo Black, concurring in McGautha v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am by B.W. Barnett
" The applicant claimed that these questions violated his rights under the Texas and United States Constitutions against self-incrimination. [read post]