Search for: "States v. State"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 258,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am
As we observed earlier this year, courts and legislatures across the country are still trying to figure out the meaning and limits of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Kohn v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am
For example, in Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
This legal stance was solidified in the landmark case of State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
State-court decisions enjoining contested votes include the following: Max v ALP, Inc., 206 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2022] [“Order . . . which granted defendants’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining . . . from commencing a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of restoring plaintiff as President and CEO of defendant ALP, Inc.. . . unanimously affirmed”]; and ANO, Inc. v Goldberg, 167 AD3d 731 [2d Dept 2018] [“Yimini… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am
” (ABS Partnership v AirTran Airways, (AD 3d 24, 29 [1st Dept 2003].) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 3:13 am
McKnight v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
When the EU acts on education via one of these indirect routes, or when Member State action on education falls within the scope of EU law (as in Commission v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
↑ Thaler v. [read post]
