Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 16,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2014, 4:42 am
United States (no relation to the singer), by Judge Stephanie Thacker, speaks volumes about the government’s ability to compel a son to testify against his father. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
The casebook profiled a series of cases in the chapter on the First Amendment that I had actually heard about in the media.Yesterday, the SCOTUS granted certiorari in Elonis vs United States, a case destined for the constitutional law casebooks. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
” See Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(e)(2)(B). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
For example, the Fifth Circuit – at the urging of the U.S. government — held in Af-Cap v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a federal judge, U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
The case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
Google Android-Java copyright case (initial reaction to ruling, follow-up, and detailed refresher Q&A, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just issued a formal mandate to the trial court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, remanding the high-profile lawsuit for a determination on fair use and (if Oracle prevails) remedies. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
” The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment of non-infringement to Acushnet. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:51 pm
Ka Nefer Nefer started when the United States Attorney in St. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:13 am
In a tremendous step forward for our right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
The key reasoning of the new decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
Similarly, the Tenth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Both decisions thus relied on the Fourth Circuit’s earlier ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
