Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 8141 - 8160 of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:49 pm by Josh Blackman
Number 1, the United States in district court insisted that an injunction would not be necessary and that it would treat the declaration as an injunction. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 2:35 am by Jane Seu
Campaign Finance Jeff Merkley and Bernie Sanders both called for the Supreme Court’s controversial case, Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
It is an excellent primer on the interplay (or lack thereof) of copyright and fashion in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
This is especially true if I’m writing about the United States Supreme Court and noting something that others didn’t feel worthy of comment. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:15 pm by Georgialee Lang
A good example is the case of G.T. v A.T. 2014 NY Slip Op 24035 where Mr. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm by Georgialee Lang
A good example is the case of G.T. v A.T. 2014 NY Slip Op 24035 where Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:51 pm by Tom
., scored a pivotal victory in a decision unanimously endorsed by all 11 judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
On May 14, 2021, the United States House of Representatives passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA” or “HR 1065”) for a second time. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm by Will Baude
In addition to the Title VII sexual orientation case I just posted about, the Seventh Circuit will also hear en banc arguments tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Respondents' use of SCHIEDMAYER is "strong evidence that they seek to draw a connection between their goods and Petitioner, the prominent source of SCHIEDMAYER keyboard musical instruments in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]