Search for: "B. R." Results 8161 - 8180 of 55,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2012, 11:27 am by Record Clearing
These People didn’t help me at all. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 7:35 am by by Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney
Bankruptcy is a fresh start for people who need relief from their financial problems. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:17 pm by Lateral Link
Don’t leave your legal career to chance! [read post]
25 May 2007, 5:08 pm
I am extremely grateful for the kind words about my blog penned  by the prolific and nationally-respected corporate law expert Professor Bainbridge here in his post announcing that he was adding me to his blogroll on his  widely-read blog, appropriately titled:... [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am by thenambypamby
One of my partners is responding to a motion for summary judgement on our biggest case. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
I am the mom who is always out of the loop. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm by Cicely Wilson
DEA, US DC Cir. (1/22/13)Constitutional Law, Drugs & Biotech, Government & Administrative Law, Health Law The DEA, under the authority of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1)(B), classified marijuana as a Schedule I drug, the most restricted drug classification under the Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:10 am by Pat Muldowney
Sanzone, Case No. 34-CA-012915, and Three D, LLC, d/b/a Triple Play Sports Bar and Grille v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:30 am by Pat Muldowney
Sanzone, Case No. 34-CA-012915, and Three D, LLC, d/b/a Triple Play Sports Bar and Grille v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The protection of diversity of ideas and opinions is fundamental to a free, pluralistic and democratic society, because as McLachlin C.J. indicated in R. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm
Dinkel from participation in all Federal health care programs under section 1128(b)(7) of the Social Security Act for a period of 8 years. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(mem. op.) in which the court denied the UIM carrier's Fed.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion filed in response to the Plaintiff's breach of contract claim based upon the carrier's failure to pay UIM benefits.The court basically found that, in reviewing the Complaint in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, it was readily apparent that the plaintiff had stated a valid cause of action upon which relief may be granted.Of note is the fact that, during the proceedings, the plaintiff's counsel withdrew… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
., 2011 NY Slip Op 02015, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Appellate Division affirmed a Supreme Court decision confirming an arbitration award, noting that “An arbitration award rendered after a consensual arbitration may be vacated by a court only on the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511(b). [read post]