Search for: "C. R. C." Results 8161 - 8180 of 58,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 19-20 January 2016. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Evans) v Information Commissioner, heard 24-25 November 2014. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 19-20 January 2016. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Evans) v Information Commissioner, heard 24-25 November 2014. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am by UKSC Blog
R v Adams (Northern Ireland), heard 19 November 2019. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Derry) v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 12 Dec 2018. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:43 am by Juana Schmidt
Aufgrund des zivilrechtlichen Fehlverhaltens sei ihm keine Vergütung für die Kosten der Verteidigung auszurichten. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Quebec (Attorney General) c. 156158 Canada Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:32 am by Juan Antúnez
The common law rule in Florida was that gifts made to lawyers in violation of ethics Rule 4-1.8(c) weren’t void per se, but they did trigger a rebuttable presumption of undue influence by the drafting lawyer. [read post]