Search for: "California Law Review" Results 8161 - 8180 of 29,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2019, 7:41 am by admin
Our attorneys can review the situation relative to the law to determine if an individual’s action at an accident scene is protected. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by SHG
By denying review, the California Supreme Court dodged the precedent bullet by not providing a decision that would be binding on all courts of the state. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
As part of Lawfare’s ongoing coverage of tech-policy and law, Andrei Gribakov examined the constitutional challenges to California’s quest to apply for an adequacy determination under the EU's General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Newly published online in Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: Method and Dialogue in History and Originalism by Logan Everett Sawyer, and “Amongst the Most Desirable Reading”: Advertising and the Fetters of the Newspaper Press in Britain, c. 1848–1914, by Anat Rosenberg. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:10 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
”  EPA further “believes it is lawful and appropriate for it to consider federally enforceable chlorpyrifos product labeling restrictions in assessing the extent of bystander risk from spray drift under both the FFDCA and FIFRA. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Circuit: The claims must be presented to an administrative review board before they can be heard in court. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Monica Williamson
Applications will be reviewed beginning July 26, 2019 until position is filled. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
Her report on the event can be found here.Books reviewsBook Review Editor Hayleigh Bosher reviews two books: Sterling on World Copyright Law and Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks & Allied Rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 12:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The paper extensively reviews the physical risk and transition risk elements of that businesses face, and readers will want to review those sections of the paper closely. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:02 am by Liz Dunshee
Accordingly, in some cases, the representative indicated, companies that may have their principal executive offices in California may not have filed their 10-Ks or California Statements during the designated review period and, as a result, their data was not included. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court review of their actions; it derives from the essence of the Rucho opinion itself. [read post]
At a minimum, businesses should review and amend their employee privacy policy and notice to meet CCPA’s requirements. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:10 pm by Peter Margulies
To begin with, the government's resort to such agreements is not reviewable in court under § 1158(a)(3). [read post]