Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 13,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
The City’s administrative approvals were subject to certain conditions, one of which related to the provision of affordable housing units. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Clemente v Mindmere Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – ADMINISTRATION CHARGE – recovery of costs as an administration charge when incurred) (Rev1) (2024) UKUT 50 (LC) An appeal on a determination of reasonableness of an administration charge. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Blumenauer, Rep. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
– 1:00 pm (Discussion) Boyd School of Law Room 203 In Person Registration is required Click Here To Register For the Student Only In Person Discussion In June, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:19 pm
The Obama Administration is pushing new legislation which would create a financial services regulatory commission. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Kresich v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:34 am
When the County declined to pay him for these additional 444 hours of vacation credit, Sabatino filed a petition in the nature of mandamus** seeking a court order compelling the County to pay him the additional amount he claimed was due him.Supreme Court granted Sabatino’s petition; the Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court’s action.The Appellate Division said that Suffolk County Resolution No. 659 was subsequently enacted as Suffolk County… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Kresich v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Pate v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Bailey, 644 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio 1994) (holding that lying to a police officer in order to interfere with the officer’s attempt to apprehend defendant’s brother was obstruction of justice); Howell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:40 am
Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
Today, we’re covering the TikTok arguments at the Supreme Court this morning,' New Yorok Times 10 January 2025).The appellate court in that suit, TikTok Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:36 am
Patrick v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
A state Superior Court found in favor of the CA SoS but a Court of Appeal found that the PEMT Requirements did indeed betray characteristics of regulations and should therefore have gone through the regulatory procedure (for the legal eagles out there, see: County of San Diego v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
The roadblock administrator needs to be able to explain to the court how they decide to stop vehicles. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
The roadblock administrator needs to be able to explain to the court how they decide to stop vehicles. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm
But what about more secular employees, such as teachers and office administrators? [read post]