Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 8161 - 8180 of 112,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 10:25 am by Keith R. McMurdy
  Otherwise, you might find that ERISA preemption does not apply and your company, not your plan, is under the gun. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:10 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This raises the question of how Europe can square its commitment to defending human rights with selling weapons to such countries. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
Unlike U.S. federal courts, the ITC does not allow defendants to raise counterclaims, and it does not consolidate investigations of cross-complaints (though it does consolidate investigations in which different defendants have to defend themselves against the same patents).Either party is asserting standard-essential patents (SEPs) and non-SEPs in this dispute. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 9:06 pm
App. 3 Dist. 2006), plaintiff, a consulting firm in Maryland that was organized as an LLC, obtained a default judgment in Maryland against defendant, which was... [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 8:35 am
Nov. 9, 2006), a jury convicted defendant Deborah Champluvier of embezzling from a limited liability company of which she was a member. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:31 pm
., Cuyahoga, Nov. 8, 2007), an Ohio court of appeals held that a trial judge did not violate the Establishment Clause when, in a traffic case, he waived a fine, imposed community service, and permitted defendant, a clergyman, to satisfy the service through his regular clergy duties. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:56 pm by admin
Generally, however, voluntary intoxication does not excuse criminal conduct. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Given that a waiver analysis does not apply to delay preceding a dismissal, the court must determine whether the principles articulated require the inclusion of this delay. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
 Unfortunately, the Supreme Court does not afford a Fifth Amendment or any other Constitutional right to bar the jury from knowing that a drunk driving defendant refused a  blood alcohol test. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:30 pm by Matt Conigliaro
By the way, does anyone know which Florida judge was the first to use the term “rear-end collision rule,” and when? [read post]
Impeachment does not implicate federalism, and it is an inherently political process, as the Founders well understood. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:51 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Importantly, Maryland premises liability law does not require a plaintiff to prove that a landowner had actual knowledge of a hazard. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:36 pm
However, the fact that the defendant did not waive the objection and prevented such testimony from being introduced, does not detract from the validity of the indictment. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Kevin Connor
Gomez that an offer of compensation, equal to or greater than the maximum potential individual damages to a defendant, does not erase a defendant’s interest in a case. [read post]