Search for: "Doe Officers"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 137,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
The major studios are curiously quiet about their China box office. [read post]
13 May 2022, 1:55 pm
He does not give up easily. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:41 pm
The automatic stay does not apply. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:41 am
When Does a Crime Become a Hate Crime in Texas? [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:52 am
Cunliffe (which it does cite, together with some other cases). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:41 pm
Does the reverse hold true? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The signs seem to be, for the moment, that the US prosecutors will let the British prosecutors have the first run at it all, which makes sense as it does seem to be a British problem, even though, technically, some of the alleged offences may also constitute offences under US law. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:26 am
But in Metropolitan, it does not appear that PERB required the Respondent to assert waiver. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
Police Officer Jeronimo Yanez was acquitted for this killing. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
Does Sanas Health Practice Ltd. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:12 am
And it does so for the relatively high-level offices for which consideration of conduct and even speech and political belief seems most legitimate. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 11:37 pm
What does anyone else think about this situation? [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:43 am
What does this case teach us? [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:03 am
The three-year statute of limitations for disqualifying an employee pursuant to Civil Service Law §50(4) does not apply in cases involving fraudUrciuoli v Department of Citywide Admin. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:21 pm
City of Los Angeles, the California Supreme Court held that this provision does not require an employer to provide notice of the specific proposed discipline within the limitations period, and noted that the fundamental purpose of the POBRA provision at issue was to place a one-year limitation on investigations of officer misconduct. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:10 pm
Iancu (Supreme Court 2021) has little chance of being granted, but it does offer some insight on USPTO procedure. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The fact that the individually named defendants were not DOE officers is irrelevant with respect to the issue of whether DOE is within the ambit of §3813(1) notice of claim requirement. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:07 am
Recently, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report, titled Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel: Observations on the Key Attributes and Challenges of Storage and Disposal Options GAO-13-532T (Apr. 11, 2013). [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The fact that the individually named defendants were not DOE officers is irrelevant with respect to the issue of whether DOE is within the ambit of §3813(1) notice of claim requirement. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Sue the police officer, of course. [read post]
