Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 8161 - 8180 of 9,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm by MacIsaac
 35, he wrote: [35]      The case law provides some guidance to the exercise of the court’s discretion. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:13 pm by Adam Thierer
Part 1 of this series examined proposals to fund media content via a tax on consumer electronics, broadband service, or cell phone bills.[1] Other essays will address proposals to tax private advertising revenues to support public media; directly subsidize out-of-work journalists; expand postal subsidies; and to prop up or bail out failing media entities. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
  However, Gajarsa, while concurring, states: “[T]he text of section 112, paragraph 1 is a model of legislative ambiguity. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 12:42 am by shellis
Don’t forget that June 1 is the deadline. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm by Sheppard Mullin
  A description that merely renders the invention obvious does not satisfy the requirement. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
  The revenue generated by the tax is then allocated among various BBC media products, with most of it going to the BBC 1 and BBC 2 television channels. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Eli Lilly (CAFC en banc 2008-1248) precedential This ruling addressed two questions: (1) Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:40 am by Jenny Swinerton
., the Court held 6-1 that the challenged statute does not violate Section 34 or 35 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:40 am by Jenny Swinerton
., the Court held 6-1 that the challenged statute does not violate Section 34 or 35 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
And beginning January 1, 2011, Medicare will do the same. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:56 pm by Kelly
The act, as written, does not include an extra income tax on high income taxpayers. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:44 am by Dennis Crouch
In a 9-2 decision, an en banc Federal Circuit has confirmed that 35 USC § 112 ¶1 includes separate written description and enablement requirements. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The closures this past Friday night included three more banks in Georgia, bringing the 2010 year to date total in that state to five, and the total since January 1, 2008 to 35, by far the highest number for any state during that period. [read post]