Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 8161 - 8180 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
To the contrary, and unlike the situation [under the previously applicable rules],[v] the Legislator has expanded the concept of enforceable titles (al-sanadat al-tanfidhiyya),[vi] which now includes criminal judgments involving restitution (radd), compensations (ta’widhat), fines (gharamat) and other civil rights (huquq madaniyyah). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm by Greg
In other words, it is a $3,000 fine, not a fine of “up to $3,000. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:11 am by David Hart QC
U & Partners (East Anglia) Ltd, R (on the application of) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm by INFORRM
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:40 am
I am sorry to say that I was not surprised when I read this article in Inside Higher Ed last week about “Pirates v. [read post]