Search for: "In Re Member of Bar"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 9,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Bublick, Miami, Florida, Attorney at Law, Practice Limited to Bankruptcy Law, Member of the Florida Bar since 1983 [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Quinn Emanuel did not handle the PTO challenge for Kraft.We also incorrectly suggested that Maxwell House is now subject to an injunction barring its use of the plastic can. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
Whole Foods' goal in pursuing the challenge is likely to seek a settlement with the FTC so that Whole Foods can move beyond the Wild Oats acquisition and re-focus its efforts on growing its business in a difficult economy. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:17 pm
At Fastcase we're excited to welcome our newest member state and we would encourage all Wisconsin lawyers to sign up for Fastcase Webinar trainings that will go over the member benefit and how to conduct legal research using Fastcase. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
After the ruling barring its expert's report, Fitel voluntarily dismissed its case so it could appeal. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Acosta-Roman, No. 071238, 071239 Appeal from sentence of three concurrent fifty-seven month sentences for three money laundering counts is dismissed where: 1) defendant's waiver was both valid and enforceable as an enhacement issue; and 2) appellate consideration of that issue, on the merits, was barred. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
"You can't dissolve the company, you're crazy! [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
Andrew Malcolm at the LATimes reads this clause, shall we say, strictly: We're not lawyers. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
And, of course, if he is found not guilty of all charges and specifications, then the case is over.As always, please let us know if you're aware of other cases that should be included in our "This week in military justice" segment. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 6:33 am
Over the summer, the American Bar Association polled its members and then published in the ABA Journal a list of the twenty-five greatest legal movies of all time, and another twenty-five honorable mentions. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
"I think this panel is simply saying, 'we're going to dot every I and cross every T,'" said Mears, who initially doubted the court would grant Davis' lawyers' request for oral argument.Mears also was skeptical about the significance of the panel's request for briefing on whether Davis can be executed if he establishes his innocence but can't prove that his lawyers were diligent enough. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:05 am
[twurl.nl](tweet tweet) @degold007 Interesting: 50 percent of attorneys are members of online social networks. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
”) The only limitation on the court's discretion to enjoin abusive litigation is that courts are not permitted to completely bar all access to the courts. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
The Lethal Injection Team will consist of a minimum of 20 members. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
The latest edition of the American Bar Association Law Practice Management section's webzine, Law Practice Today, is live today. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:56 pm
Consider the following: No Confirmation of Removal: If you’re the copyright holder, there is no confirmation that the infringing work has been removed and you are actually barred from seeing it for yourself (unless you can trick the other person onto “friending” you). [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
"The legislation bars only Level 2 and Level 3 registered sex offenders from residing, working or entering within 1,000 feet of areas designated as child safety zones. [read post]
