Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 8161 - 8180 of 8,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
(This is also not a post for lay readers or dabblers in drug and device law; we'll be playing real inside baseball here. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:22 am
Clement contended that the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 12:41 pm
  Each has very specific mandates as to how many PSAs about the digital transition are required, and how much additional content (crawls, various over-lays onto programming, long-form programs) are required to meet the obligations. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
By Big Tent Democrat Here is the transcript of the Carville (a Clinton supporter) v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Ben-Shahar lays out how, in the most general instance, the legal rule is irrelevant. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
You would think that in light of the Mitchell Report and the Clemens debacle, major league baseball would want to lay low and try to curry the favor of its most ardent fans and Congress. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:59 am
On March 5, 2008 in USA v Deverso, the Eleventh Circuit did not find any error in the admission of an unsigned foreign birth certificate. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:12 pm
On March 4, 2008, IPBiz received a comment to an earlier post What Gettysburg teaches us about KSR v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:40 am
Universal Pictures Corporation (1930), or the story being told test put forward by the Ninth Circuit in Warner Brothers Pictures v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:07 am
It also lay at the heart of a controversy concerning the re-incorporation of News Corporation (News Corp) in Delaware. [read post]