Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8161 - 8180 of 21,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Edward Foley
Not everyone at the time agreed that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional; the Federalists vociferously defended it. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:32 am by Dean Freeman
Following the jury’s decision, defendant hotel filed a motion for a directed verdict, arguing plaintiff failed to sustain the burden of proving such an accident on site was reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:22 am by Keith S. Brais & Richard D. Rusak
Once filed in the federal court, Westbank, the defendant employer, filed formal demand seeking a jury, not the federal judge, decide the facts of the case, if it was liable for the accident, and if so, how much compensation the injured seaman is entitled to receive. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:54 am
The other three defendants were deemed liable to the following extents: Fel Pro - 30%, Crane Company - 20%, and Cleaver Brooks - 10%. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:39 am by Joy Waltemath
AAAP defaulted, and the plaintiffs added Royal as a defendant, contending that the company was vicariously liable for the TCPA violations. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:04 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
In this case lawyer-defendant argued the deed she drafted was a two-sided real estate transaction, which meant she couldn’t ethically represent both sides of the same deal, which meant she couldn’t be sued by the other side either. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 10:35 am by Hollis Wright
The suits, citing a host of studies, claim the manufacturers of the PPI drugs (the defendants) should be held liable and accountable for the damage caused to patients while taking said drugs. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 10:35 am by Hollis Wright
The suits, citing a host of studies, claim the manufacturers of the PPI drugs (the defendants) should be held liable and accountable for the damage caused to patients while taking said drugs. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The trial court noted that the liability at issue was vicarious as to CIP, and if Gujrati was found liable, CIP was also liable, and conversely, if Gujrati was not liable, CIP would not be liable. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:23 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
… To be liable for punitive damages, a defendants harm to the plaintiff need not be intentional. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm by Adam Levitin
It’s important to understand that by indorsing the note, Fearson became liable on the note along with X. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:36 pm by Theodore R. Flo
” The court also ignored the obvious and clearly-implied corollary to Navient’s argument: The only way for Navient to be liable for the claims alleged in the complaint would be for a court, namely, the Middle District of Pennsylvania, to adopt the Bureau’s position. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by Neumann Law Group
The appeals court first explained that the trial court’s conclusion that Canton Township could be vicariously liable was clearly erroneous. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:03 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Defendants in the present matter argued that, “in order for a municipality to be held liable for a suicide, one of these three exceptions must apply. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t seem right to make a defendant go research the world’s laws, and it seems even less right for an “innocent non-party,” which is Google’s role in this case, to do it. [read post]