Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 28,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Southern Coach Lines v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The California Supreme Court has added to this line of cases in Peabody v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preserv., 27 NY3d 174, the court explained that "The concept of the separation of powers is the bedrock of the system of government adopted by this State in establishing three coordinate and coequal branches of government, each charged with performing particular functions. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
(also captioned v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:12 am
See also, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Bowring v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
These regulations treat state office digital campaign materials in the same manner as traditional campaign materials and do not put any extra burdens on candidates and their campaigns.In 2011, the judiciary flexed its social media wings in Griffin v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
(and its subsequent case, Musnuff v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
An enclosed proposed draft order varied some provisions of Sharp J’s earlier orders, but effectively left the restrictions in place, in line with what the Interveners had originally wanted. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
No one knows why.The decision in Servier v Apotex [2011] EWHC 730 (Pat) handed down this morning is not one of these fabled decisions, close though it is to nudging under the triple-digit paragraph line. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am
One final point, about Terry v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
This is a state court procedure. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
Heijmen v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
