Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8161 - 8180 of 15,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 5:53 am
The inference of intent must be logically compelling and must exclude any 'logical gaps--that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree--which, if undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference' (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363, 367). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm by John Day
Lowe’s Home Ctrs., Inc., 563 F.3d 171, 177 (6th Cir. 2009). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 13 - 10 AM: Rocket Trademarks Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:14 am
Gall looks a lot like Claiborne v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Lowe, 333 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. [read post]