Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 8161 - 8180 of 42,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 9:08 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
At both summary judgment and at trial, Wackenhut moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that the plaintiff’s claims failed, for she had not shown any impact. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:08 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
At both summary judgment and at trial, Wackenhut moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that the plaintiff’s claims failed, for she had not shown any impact. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:52 am by John L. Culhane, Jr.
  Because the Borrower Defense rule took effect in October 2018 after the D.C. federal district court refused to grant the renewed motion for a preliminary injunction filed by the California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools that sought to preliminarily enjoin the arbitration ban and class action waiver provisions in the Borrower Defense rule, the new final regulations, as a technical matter, amend but do not rescind the Borrower Defense rule.… [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am by Peter Mahler
Three Questions Question #1:  Does the Qadan ruling set a precedent against imposing personal liability on the majority shareholders for compelled buy-outs in dissolution proceedings, absent evidence sufficient to pierce the corporate veil? [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:55 am by Bexis
  See id. at 14 ("[plaintiff's] records, which have been duly admitted into evidence, all state that [he] ceased smoking at various dates in the 1990s"). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But, it found no evidence of such an entitlement in any event because the Rules impose “stringent requirements for certification that in practice exclude most claims. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court notes that not all evidence at trial qualifies as a solemn formal accusation. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
This is especially true if there is evidence of ‘judge shopping’ or it is apparent that a party is seeking, for delay or abusive purposes, a reconsideration of prior rulings. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 3:57 pm
Impeachment proceedings are not governed by the same rules as criminal proceedings. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:42 pm by Busby & Associates
Presenting Evidence: Presenting evidence to a jury requires a different approach than presenting to a judge. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm by Shams Hirji
On Friday evening, the Sixth Circuit issued a ruling on several pending motions in the OSHA ETS litigation. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Alex Gasser
  Kodak opposed on procedural grounds, arguing that remedy-related matters require an ALJ to issue a Recommended Determination, while grants of summary determination motions are accomplished through an Initial Determination – therefore, it would be improper to grant a motion for summary determination on a remedy-related issue. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court’s recognition of the relatively low constitutional significance of speech relating to purely private matters, evidence of potentially severe harm to individuals arising from nonconsensual publication of intimate depictions of them, and a litany of analogous restrictions on speech that are generally viewed as uncontroversial and fully consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
Under the Act, rulings of law are reviewed de novo, and findings of fact are reviewed for substantial evidence. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm by Eric Goldman
Not only did Mavrix overclaim in its paraphrase of the rules, but the rules don’t show the requisite level of control or inducement, either. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The court ruled the facts and evidence were not sufficient to prove that the defendant had constructively possessed marijuana. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
The court ruled the facts and evidence were not sufficient to prove that the defendant had constructively possessed marijuana. [read post]