Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 8161 - 8180 of 42,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 7:13 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
 In the instant case, the appeals court found that the evidence of non-party negligence was not sufficient to put the question to a jury, and reversed and remanded the matter for further proceedings. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
The parties may agree that it can form part of the evidence. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:50 am by SHG
If approved by the SEC, the new listing rules would require all companies listed on Nasdaq’s U.S. [read post]
Justice Thomas recently endorsed Harrison’s view, writing that “[r]emedies ‘operate with respect to specific parties,’ not ‘on legal rules in the abstract. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  In affirming a final administrative decision of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, a Pennsylvania intermediate appellate court ruled that the 95 interpreters of Professional Interpreters of Erie were misclassified as independent contractors. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:39 am by John Jascob
Regarding disclosure matters, DiGuiseppe said State Street expects heightened investor scrutiny around discretionary executive compensation decisions due to the pandemic. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
The recent SEC amendments to the auditor independence rules generally provide more flexibility to companies when selecting an auditor. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:16 pm by Scott McKeown
” This reasoning is difficult to reconcile with later examples in the Final Rule Notice that such evidence may be directed to objective indicia of non-obviousness. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 pm
The new report, which has been obtained by NBC News, does not explicitly say that the microwaves were deployed intentionally as a weapon, but does not rule that possibility out. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
The court based its ruling on circumstantial evidence that established two key factors. [read post]
It should also be noted that MDHHS and the CDC rules also interact with requirements set forth by regulatory rules, such as those set forth by the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:44 pm by Thomas John
Contributions concern the 1961 Apostille Convention; the 1965 Service and 1970 Evidence Conventions; the 2005 Choice of Court Convention; and finally, the 2019 Judgments Convention which was decades in the making. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
If defendant is unaware that the plaintiff has engaged in a protected activity (or is a member of a protected class) and subjects the plaintiff to some adverse employment action, there can be no causal link as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
Is it compatible with Directive 2008/95 to require the trade mark proprietor against which action is being taken due to revocation of the trade mark to comprehensively explain the use of the trade mark, but to impose the risk of evidence not being furnished on the cancellation applicant? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
For example, First Liberty praised the new rule, saying in part:Religious organizations should never be forced to abandon their religious identity and mission in order to be eligible to partner with the federal government.On the other hand, Americans United said in part:The constitutional right to religious freedom promises everyone the right to live their lives secure that the government will treat them equally, no matter what their belief system. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Evidence also suggests that authorizing New York City to impose a so-called pied-à-terre tax on second residences within the city, while superficially appealing as a way to export taxes to wealthy nonresidents, could backfire by driving out a subset of taxpayers who impose few costs on the city while contributing substantially to its tax base. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:11 pm by Melissa E. Scott
The TTAB ultimately held that “previous registration of matter added in a proposed amendment is not an exception to the rule against material alteration; it is a factor to be considered in determining whether the alteration is material. [read post]