Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 8161 - 8180 of 9,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
On a day when tears were shed on both sides of the courtroom and in the spectator section, State Supreme Court Justice John L. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Apparently, the (l) issue wasn't even really addressed much by either party or the court at the trial level. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
It's very difficult to conclude that the receipt of Equal Dollars represent imputed income, which the IRS as a matter of administrative practice declines to tax and which some theorists claim isn't income in the first place, because imputed income situations involve people doing work for themselves, such as mowing their own lawn or cooking their own meals. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:28 pm
(Also said as: "It doesn't matter whether one's a doctor or lawyer, the important thing is: Zei a Mensch.) [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:29 pm
COMPARATIVE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONFERENCE 8-11 SEPTEMBER 2009 UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG TUESDAY 8 SEPTEMBER 2009 WELCOMING ADDRESS Prof P H O'Brien Executive Dean: Faculty of Law University of Johannesburg OPENING ADDRESS Member Executive Leader Group University of Johannesburg KEY-NOTE ADDRESS (I) Reconciling classic private international law with fidelity to constitutional values Prof C F Forsyth University of Cambridge United Kingdom PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:06 am by Bill Heinze
Equivalents are therefore presumptively not available as to any of the subject matter added in Felix’s first amendment. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:35 am
S 2406 BLURB : Exec. ban gender idnty discrimntnLast Act: 04/09/09 advanced to third reading cal.332S4091 SAMPSON -- Provides an election by a defendant in criminal matters to have the case appear before a judge or justice admitted to practice law in the state Same as A 5899 BLURB : UJCA. jdg prct nys Last Act: 04/09/09 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:12 am
Until then, it's a matter of guessing.The answer to the third question is impossible to determine. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
I know that the 1-800 contacts court noted that the web address was not the mark, but I can't see why that should matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:32 am
Cir. 1987) The topic of parol evidence arose:As a subordinate issue to the proper interpretation of the covenant not to sue, TransCore argues that the district court abused its discretion by excluding parol evidence of TransCore's and Mark IV's intent at the time they entered into the settlement agreement. [read post]