Search for: "MCDONALD "
Results 8161 - 8180
of 9,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2009, 9:07 am
Others in the top ten; CocaCola, McDonalds, Apple etc. all make sense. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:19 pm
It ruled that there was little danger of confusion as the McDonald's served fast food whilst the appellant sold Indian food. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:15 am
Further, the patrons of the Indian restaurant were adults whilst, accorduing to the court, McDonald's served mainly kids.It should be noted that Malaysia does not have dilution provisions which may have given McDonald's a remedy without the need to show confusion. [read post]
"McDonald's loses trademark battle in Malaysia; Court says McCurry restaurant gets to keep its name"
30 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
" The Associated Press reports that "Malaysia Rules McDonald's Has No Monopoly on 'Mc.'" And Reuters reports that "McCurry beats McDonald's in lawsuit. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:09 am
McDonald’s (”Billions and Billions Served”) has suffered a reversal in the landmark case of McDonald’s v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:09 am
McDonald’s (”Billions and Billions Served”) has suffered a reversal in the landmark case of McDonald’s v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 5:45 am
" This is the famous "McLibel" case, in which two activists were sued in England by the McDonalds burger chain. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:22 am
Exhibits regarding the NIOSH and McDonald Studies are cumulative, and not highly probative with regard to the defendants' knowledge of dangerousness. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
Smith us 330 pounds with the longest arms of any tackle... but you have to worry about character issues with this guy and keep him away from McDonalds. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
There is no duty to warn of dangers that are obvious or a matter of common knowledge (see for example, Bogle and others v McDonalds Restaurants Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 436 where the court found that McDonalds were not negligent in supplying cups of hot tea and coffee without a warning as consumers generally knew that there was a risk of scalding if hot drinks were spilled). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:02 pm
McDonald, __ M.J. ___, No. 1294 (C.G. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
When someone at a party mentions the McDonald’s coffee case, a good lawyer can point out the salient facts — McDonald’s had hundreds of prior complaints about how hot its coffee was, the woman was horribly injured, she offered to settle for her medical expenses — between sips of his Cabernet. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:51 pm
Frances Beinecke, President, Natural Resources Defense Council Meg McDonald, Director, Global Issues, Alcoa Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
by Jason Fischer Short Answer: No. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
McDonald for Grace. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:08 am
Try this: First, meet at a fast food place, such as McDonalds or Starbucks. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:15 pm
(FayObserver.com)Ohio paralegal Sharon Jarosz, formerly with the Cleveland law firm McDonald Hopkins, has joined the estate and planning group at Stark & Knoll Co. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:28 am
The couple has a strong premises liability case against McDonald's. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:38 pm
Clostridium difficile in Retail Meat Products, USA, 2007 Songer JG, Trinh HT, Killgore GE, Thompson AD, McDonald LC, Limbago BM. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
McDonald, which in the opinion of many was neither faithful to the text nor the context of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
