Search for: "Mark"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 151,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 2:59 am
Applicant's claim of transferred distinctiveness from its mark GASOLINA SANGRIIIA missed the target. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark FIRST TUESDAY under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act, deeming the mark merely descriptive of "lottery cards; scratch cars for playing lottery games" and for "lottery services. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:46 am
Sure, the marks are identical, but what about the goods? [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:08 am
Goodman).Trademark Rule 2.51(a) requires that the drawing of the mark be a "substantially exact representation" of the mark as used on or with the goods. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
"As to the marks, applicant's mark "falls in the grey region between pure design marks which cannot be vocalized and word marks which are clearly intended to be. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 am
The Board found the marks likely to cause confusion with the registered mark TROPIXX for various entertainment services, including nightclub services and live performances by musical bands. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:40 am
The Marks: The Board found TRI-FLEX to be the dominant element in both marks. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 2:47 am
However, the mark only suggests at the show’s format. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:55 am
Bergsman).The Marks: The Board wasted little time in finding the marks confusingly similar, concluding that the addition of the letter "S" and the descriptive term "Pils" to the cited mark failed to distinguish the marks at issue. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:25 am
" Applicant maintained that because the USPTO has permitted numerous pairs of similar marks to register for different alcoholic beverages, there can be no likelihood of confusion between its mark and the cited mark. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Inventive step has in previous years been allocated far fewer marks (the 2018 paper and mark scheme can be found here). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:13 am
Applicant did not dispute that the marks are similar and the services related. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:01 am
" In re Micros Systems, Inc., Serial No. 85826131 (March 6, 2015) [not precedential].The marks: The Board found applicant’s mark MISTORE to be the phonetic equivalent of the dominant portion of the cited mark, MYSTORE. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am
Salazar's use of the subject mark on his website was mere advertising use and did not constitute use of the mark in commerce within the meaning of the Trademark Act. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:21 am
Applicant argued that the commercial impression of the marks differ because the cited mark is “highly suggestive of a person named JACQUELINE” whereas Applicant’s mark identifies "JACQUELINE ANNE," a different person with a different name.]In re Brilliant Massage Therapy dba Brilliant Massage & Skin, Serial No. 88903456 (April 21, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 4:14 am
As part of a long running battle over the mark DERMAPEN, the Board deemed that mark abandoned because the respondent's parent was the user of the mark but the registration was owned by a subsidiary. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 2:48 am
The Board affirmed Section 2(d) refusals to register the two Chinese character marks shown below, for "restaurant services," finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark SEAHORSE for "bar, lounge services. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:45 am
The Board concluded that the SKY NEWS mark is "entitled to an ordinary scope of protection. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:20 am
Moreover, no one else uses the mark. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(a) refusal to register the mark AWSHIT WORKS, in standard character form, for baseball caps and other clothing items, finding the mark to be scandalous. [read post]
