Search for: "NO PARTY"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 364,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2009, 5:30 pm
” The parties’ agreement, which Judge Ricardo Martinez signed, terminates the trademark infringement suit plaintiff brought in September. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 7:40 am
The Court held that "while admissions of a party-opponent are not hearsay, 'a party may not utilize his own admissions at trial.'" Since evidence that would not be admissible at trial may not be considered on a Motion for Summary Judgment, there was no competent evidence contradicting Defendant's properly supported factual position. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court made clear to the lower courts that it is their duty to make sure the parties do not use their peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner, and that the court must make a “sincere and reasoned attempt to evaluate” the explanations proffered by the party bumping the jurors. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:57 am
As a threshold matter, a divorce would sever and terminate most spousal and inheritance rights between the parties. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 pm
At a little before 3:00 am, the group was still traveling and partying. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court made clear to the lower courts that it is their duty to make sure the parties do not use their peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner, and that the court must make a “sincere and reasoned attempt to evaluate” the explanations proffered by the party bumping the jurors. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:51 am
If a patient harmed by medical malpractice pursues claims against a negligent doctor, the doctor may attempt to avoid liability by arguing that the negligence of a third party caused the patient’s harm. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
For an unknown, but surely exorbitant, cost to the defendants, the courts, and maybe even the third party payors who brought these suits, the RICO claims are exposed as unsupported nonsense and most—maybe all, eventually—of the state law claims go the same way. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:09 pm
They stem from high school graduation parties. [read post]
12 May 2009, 5:42 am
BRIAN DOHERTY: Tea Party: Drink Up, Democrats! [read post]
DO YOU KNOW ME WELL ENOUGH TO HATE ME? The man who this week became a symbol of Tea Party intoleran…
29 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm
The man who this week became a symbol of Tea Party intolerance was once a major Democratic donor, contributing tens of thousands of dollars to the party. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:52 pm
THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW: Specter condemned Jim Jeffords’ party switch in 2001. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 1:12 pm
THE “TEA PARTY” SPIRIT GOES LOCAL: “Ann Meagher, president of the Greater Southern Dutchess Chamber of Commerce, and others, brought teabags into the hearing and placed them on a table near the podium, in reference to the Boston Tea Party of 1773. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:15 pm
Which, you know, undercuts previous dismissals of the Tea Party protests as just a Fox News hype-production, right? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
The Salem News reports that a youth attending the party allowed the officers to enter the home. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Allegedly, the Tea Party movement has been violent, angry, intent to incite fear and hate among the populace. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 1:35 am
The amended rule reads as follows: 88.09 PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL Every party not represented by counsel who participates in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, parentage or the modification of a judgment in any such proceeding shall: (a) Complete a litigant awareness program that includes an explanation of the risks and responsibilities of self-representation, unless waived by the circuit court. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:00 am
Katz, the California Supreme Court's analysis there under the contractual/prevailing party provisions of Civil Code section 1717. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:35 am
The parties filed a joint proposed statement regarding marital and non-marital property. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:54 pm
Dismissing the suit, the district court held that CRST was the prevailing party. [read post]
