Search for: "People v Word" Results 8161 - 8180 of 17,918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by UK Supreme Court Yearbook
The first two articles are from quite possibly the most authoritative people who could speak about the Yearbook—i.e., the President and Deputy President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs admitted to being “highly concerned” about the potential ramifications of the Philippines v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
” One of the mayor’s friends also allegedly used the “n-word” and the mayor took no offense. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
  She voted to affirm the decision in a case reported on here, PRL USA Holdings v. [read post]