Search for: "S. et al" Results 8161 - 8180 of 29,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2018, 7:32 am
But for every beast whose ravings threaten the good order of the global system, the great defenders of the transnational order could wield regulatory reform, like music in William Congreve’s play, The Mourning Bride, with “[c]harms to sooth a savage B[r]east, To soften Rocks, or bend a knotted Oak. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 12:55 pm by José Guillermo
NO hay que comer, la gente piensa que el gobierno los provee de soya, un detective logra averiguar que NO existe soya y que los humanos se comen a otros humanos que, después de muertos, son convertidos en galletas, la película termina con el descubrimiento al que etá asociado, aun en esas circunstancias EL PODER. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:01 am by Andy Pushalik
Papp v Stokes et al, 2017 ONSC 2357 – Employer’s negative reference does not trigger damages because it was substantially true and is covered by qualified privilege (so long as there is no proof of malice). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 10:13 am by David Post
Bannon's written agreement with Donald J. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:51 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Administrator Pruitt (Respondents) to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction while granting a motion by League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. de C.V. et al. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
On the heels of the Ericsson decision, further briefing on the waiver issue was recently authorized in Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The SG’s stated justification for the Court to grant the petition is no longer operative—yet the SG has not whispered a word to the Court about that decisive change of circumstance.-- Second, the SG not only asked the Court to grant cert. on the Appointments Clause question where there was no longer any factual predicate for it; he also asked the Court to expand the Question Presented to include an additional constitutional challenge to a federal statute (regarding… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The SG’s stated justification for the Court to grant the petition is no longer operative—yet the SG has not whispered a word to the Court about that decisive change of circumstance.-- Second, the SG not only asked the Court to grant cert. on the Appointments Clause question where there was no longer any factual predicate for it; he also asked the Court to expand the Question Presented to include an additional constitutional challenge to a federal statute (regarding… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
   In a separate econ paper (Bereskin, et al) argues that plaintiffs bringing patent infringement lawsuits see increased stock-value. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:15 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
» Bitcoin et al.: «To help me get my head fully around all that’s going on behind that surge, or mania, or whatever it is, I’ve composed a lexicon-in-process that I’m publishing here so I can find it again. [read post]