Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 8,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 5:12 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:40 pm
This law was the direct result of a young girl who was using a wading pool. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:27 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Facts - Ali Ms Ali, a single parent with two young children, made a homelessness application to Birmingham in October 2006. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
However, this moment is much more encompassing than right v. left or red v. blue. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
Many young educated liberals support the legality of same-sex marriage, but unless they intend to marry someone of the same sex, their connection to the issue is largely symbolic. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:56 pm
The case that controls this issue is Florida v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
United States: hard cases make bad law. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
In the case of FCC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Surprisingly, but thankfully, the New England Journal of Medicine felt so strongly about the effort to shield pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers from liability, they filed an unsolicited brief with the United States Supreme Court in a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in the 2005 case Roper v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
But as Judge Rakoff sums up the conundrum in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:13 pm
A repeal in November doesn't necessarily mean Roe v. [read post]
