Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
In those situations, the system wisely leaves enforcement to the state as sovereign. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:32 am
(D) The user’s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that the user consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if the user’s address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that the user will accept service of process from the person who provided notification to the… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:06 pm
Alegre (September 23, 2009), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two) weighed in on discovery conduct. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
In 1999, the District Court ordered a judicial sale of her property to satisfy those relatively small debts. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:42 am
National Credit Acceptance, Inc., (First District, June 25, 2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 324, 95 Cal.Rptr.3d 880, 09 Cal. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
" Third, the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:24 pm
In Nahigian v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:24 pm
In Nahigian v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:28 am
No, all you need to do is know when to go with a dissent from another district:We recognize that shortly after Campbell, the First District Court of Appeal, in Jefferson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
They urged the Court to review only the first question raised, on the question of jurisdiction in the district court. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:46 pm
The district court denied the motion. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
In House v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
The first subsection of ENDA's Section 3(a)(3) covers private workers. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:23 am
In Rhodes v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Cause number 2005-17972 was originally filed in the 113th District Court, HarrisCounty, Texas, but was transferred to the 61st District Court, Harris County, Texas.The same trial court that had dismissed appellants’ suit for want of prosecution, the 61st District Court, held a hearing on appellants’ application for vacatur. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
(various citations and case-specific dates omitted).That started the ball rolling - at least for us.Not every New Jersey district court judge agreed with Thompson. [read post]
