Search for: "State v. Force" Results 8161 - 8180 of 32,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
(v)               Consent may be revoked or withdrawn any time before or during the act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:55 am
Sophie Papadileris, Protection of Peacekeepers Resorting to Armed Force – A Current Dilemma German Practice Guido Hildner, The Activation of the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression: The Edifice is Completed Helmut Philipp Aust & Mehrdad Payandeh, German Practice With Regard to the Use of Force in Syria Sara Jötten & Felix Machts, Ban on Strike Action for Civil Servants is Constitutional: The Judgment of the Federal… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
Russia is, therefore, legally permitted to build up its deployed strategic forces—but not by much. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm by Hadley Baker
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by Laya Maheshwari
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
When higher-level executives visited from Korea, she was forced to fill in for the normal receptionist because they didn’t think the receptionist was pretty enough. [read post]
When higher-level executives visited from Korea, she was forced to fill in for the normal receptionist because they didn’t think the receptionist was pretty enough. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
  The burden of proof and presumption of innocence remain in full force! [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, even as it belatedly repudiated that awful precedent. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm by John Ross
That's because courts have shunned the only means available for obtaining relief: Bivens v. [read post]