Search for: "State v. Light" Results 8161 - 8180 of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by SHG
But in the matter of the state of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Following the recent grant of cert. in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
4 May 2025, 1:39 am by Mayela Celis
Philipp.[2] In light of the importance of US practice for the development of customary law around sovereign immunity,[3] and its impact on questions of historical justice and transnational accountability, the Simon development deserves  particular attention. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
Section V then focuses on the alternative to ideology and economic reform offered through Chinese Party and state practice. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
In particular, the company stated that it was not a communicating the works to the public, because the vehicles’ built-in radio system forms an integral part of the car's equipment. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Laura H. Juillet
Back in 2001, Witley & District Men’s Club tried toargue that an agreement stating that the worker would not be entitled to any payment for accrued holiday if he was dismissed for dishonesty fulfilled the requirements of Regulation 14 and could therefore be enforced (Witley & District Men’s Club v Mackay). [read post]
2 May 2023, 1:43 pm
Blogging has been light over the past year because I've been getting accustomed to a career as a legal academic. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
She stated that “regrettably, the majority agreed with the respondent state that the applicant companies’ activities did not fall within the exception for the purposes of journalism in the Personal Data Act” and that this can lead to an interpretation “that journalists are so limited in processing data that the entire journalistic activity becomes futile (..), particularly in the light of the dynamic and evolving character of media”. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:14 am by Neil Siegel
For all the textual parsing back and forth at oral argument yesterday in King v. [read post]