Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 8161 - 8180 of 28,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
They had lived and worked in New York State for most of their adult lives, but planned to return to Canada if they could find suitable work. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:28 am by Moria Miller
 Vázquez also studies the effect of the intersection of immigration and criminal law in the criminal justice system on Latinos, arguing that the incorporation of immigration law and enforcement into the criminal justice system has become the primary means to subordinate and socially marginalize Latinos living in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The right of the state to require vaccination was upheld in Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
The court rejected Lewis's objection stating, `I'm imposing 6[.n.], all of it. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The testimony was admissible because it showed her state of mind to show that they were not in a sexual relationship at that time since consent was a live issue. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The letter stated that the appellant and her three daughters now lived there and the property had become severely overcrowded. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
Nonetheless, you can see why a jury might decide as they did in both cases.The cases raise for me the eternal question of how we qualitatively compare murder cases to decide who lives and who dies. [read post]