Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
One example: a state AG is elected only by his/her states’ voters but this law would give them increased powers to force Internet intermediaries to make changes across their national or even global service that will affect residents who never could vote for–or against–that AG. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:10 am
For example, a recent Texas car accident case, Sibel Onasis Ferrer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Agility Public Warehousing Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:53 am
But most rulings aren't Kelo v. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
In the second case this morning, Elonis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am
In June, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor attracted attention for her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:53 am
Co. v State Liq. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
In AFSCME Council 25 v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:33 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v State of New York Unified Ct. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:49 pm
” In the other case, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
” More commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
Yale hosted CELS V, and the committee did a bang up job: the food was tasty; there were no technical snafus of note; and the panels appeared to have a high degree of internal validity & congruence. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
Cognisant no doubt of the ECHR’s statement in Gillan and Quinton v UK, that ‘the risks of discriminatory use of the powers against such persons [individuals of black and Asian origin] is a very real consideration’ (para 85), the Government made a statement on the use of section 44, in July 2010. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:28 pm
In Jodka v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
Arising out of the Ninth Circuit, Ross asks a question central to our constitutional system: Leveraging its immense market power, may a single state (California) usurp Congress’s authority over interstate commerce by enacting a regulation that forces the restructuring of an entire U.S. industry, in this case the national pork products industry? [read post]
